Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Austin N. FOWLER Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900133 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell, USMC. Sentence adjudged 6 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina,
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Austin N. FOWLER Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900133 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell, USMC. Sentence adjudged 6 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, c..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and RUSSELL,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Austin N. FOWLER
Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900133
Decided: 30 October 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell, USMC. Sentence adjudged 6
March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting
alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 6 months,
and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC,
USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
United States v. Fowler, No. 201900133
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2