Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opinion No. Ag, (1949)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 12, 1949
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** TRANSCRIPT — RIGHT — COSTS ** ANY IDEA THAT A DEFENDANT COULD REFUSE TO PAY FOR THE TAKING AND TRANSCRIBING OF THE TESTIMONY AND AT THE SAME TIME REFUSE "TO PROCEED OR PERMIT THE COURT TO PROCEED WITH THE EXAMINATION" SEEMS NOVEL INDEED. THE AUTHORITY OF A COURT TO PROCEED WITH AN EXAMINATION AND TAKING OF TESTIMONY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON THE PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF THE DEFENDANT, AND WE AGREE THAT UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES THE COURT HAS FULL AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITHOUT REGARD
More

OPINION — AG — ** TRANSCRIPT — RIGHT — COSTS ** ANY IDEA THAT A DEFENDANT COULD REFUSE TO PAY FOR THE TAKING AND TRANSCRIBING OF THE TESTIMONY AND AT THE SAME TIME REFUSE "TO PROCEED OR PERMIT THE COURT TO PROCEED WITH THE EXAMINATION" SEEMS NOVEL INDEED. THE AUTHORITY OF A COURT TO PROCEED WITH AN EXAMINATION AND TAKING OF TESTIMONY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON THE PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF THE DEFENDANT, AND WE AGREE THAT UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES THE COURT HAS FULL AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE WISHES OF THE DEFENDANT. (EQUAL PROTECTION, PAYMENT, INDIGENT, CRIMINAL) CITE: 22 Ohio St. 258 [22-258], 62 Ohio St. 323 [62-323] (SAM H. LATTIMORE)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer