Opinion No. Ag, (1984)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 6
Judges: MICHAEL C. TURPEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: Oct. 30, 1984
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** OPEN MEETING ACT — MUNICIPALITY — COMMITTEES ** PURSUANT TO THE OPEN MEETING ACT, 25 Ohio St. 301 [ 25-301 ] ET SEQ., AS AMENDED, WHEN A SUBORDINATE ENTITY, CREATED BY A PARENT ENTITY THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW, EXERCISES ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY, THE SUBORDINATE ENTITY MUST COMPLY WITH THE OPEN MEETING LAW. WHETHER A SUBORDINATE ENTITY ESTABLISHED BY A PARTICULAR CITY COMMISSION IS EXERCISING ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY IS A FA
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** OPEN MEETING ACT — MUNICIPALITY — COMMITTEES ** PURSUANT TO THE OPEN MEETING ACT, 25 Ohio St. 301 [ 25-301 ] ET SEQ., AS AMENDED, WHEN A SUBORDINATE ENTITY, CREATED BY A PARENT ENTITY THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW, EXERCISES ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY, THE SUBORDINATE ENTITY MUST COMPLY WITH THE OPEN MEETING LAW. WHETHER A SUBORDINATE ENTITY ESTABLISHED BY A PARTICULAR CITY COMMISSION IS EXERCISING ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY IS A FAC..
More
OPINION — AG — ** OPEN MEETING ACT — MUNICIPALITY — COMMITTEES ** PURSUANT TO THE OPEN MEETING ACT, 25 Ohio St. 301 [25-301] ET SEQ., AS AMENDED, WHEN A SUBORDINATE ENTITY, CREATED BY A PARENT ENTITY THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW, EXERCISES ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY, THE SUBORDINATE ENTITY MUST COMPLY WITH THE OPEN MEETING LAW. WHETHER A SUBORDINATE ENTITY ESTABLISHED BY A PARTICULAR CITY COMMISSION IS EXERCISING ACTUAL OR DE FACTO DECISION MAKING AUTHORITY IS A FACTUAL QUESTION THAT THE A.G. CANNOT ADDRESS. (SUBORDINATE, PLANNING COMMITTEE, CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE) CITE: 25 Ohio St. 201 [25-201] 25 Ohio St. 301 [25-301], 25 Ohio St. 304 [25-304] (RICHARD MILDREN) ** SEE OPINION NO. 90-517 (1990)
Source: CourtListener
