Opinion No. 51-0724, (1951)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 24, 1951
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY — BEAUTY SCHOOL ** THAT THE MARKED PORTION OF RULE 29 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONSIDERED AS HAVING SUPERSEDED BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 158; AND THAT SAID RULE 29 SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, SO AS TO PERMIT THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID APPLICATION FOR ENROLLMENT IN THE " ADVANCED OPERATOR " COURSE IN THE CASE SET OUT IN YOUR LETTER. (COURSES, LICENSE, REGISTRATION, EXAMINATION, INSTRUCTOR, STUDENT, TRAINING) CITE: 59 Ohio St. 199 .7 [ 59-199.7 ] (
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY — BEAUTY SCHOOL ** THAT THE MARKED PORTION OF RULE 29 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONSIDERED AS HAVING SUPERSEDED BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 158; AND THAT SAID RULE 29 SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, SO AS TO PERMIT THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID APPLICATION FOR ENROLLMENT IN THE " ADVANCED OPERATOR " COURSE IN THE CASE SET OUT IN YOUR LETTER. (COURSES, LICENSE, REGISTRATION, EXAMINATION, INSTRUCTOR, STUDENT, TRAINING) CITE: 59 Ohio St. 199 .7 [ 59-199.7 ] (M..
More
OPINION — AG — ** STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY — BEAUTY SCHOOL ** THAT THE MARKED PORTION OF RULE 29 SHOULD BE TREATED AND CONSIDERED AS HAVING SUPERSEDED BY THE PASSAGE OF SENATE BILL NO. 158; AND THAT SAID RULE 29 SHOULD BE MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY, SO AS TO PERMIT THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID APPLICATION FOR ENROLLMENT IN THE " ADVANCED OPERATOR " COURSE IN THE CASE SET OUT IN YOUR LETTER. (COURSES, LICENSE, REGISTRATION, EXAMINATION, INSTRUCTOR, STUDENT, TRAINING) CITE: 59 Ohio St. 199.7 [59-199.7] (MAINARD KENNERLY)
Source: CourtListener
