Opinion No., (1969)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 02, 1969
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — **** ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY — DUAL OFFICES **** AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAN RUN FOR ANOTHER OFFICE, BUT UPON HIS ELECTION AND ENTERING THE DUTIES OF THE SECOND OFFICE, HE WOULD IPSO FACTO VACATE THE OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNDER THE RULE SET FORTH IN " GIBSON V. CROWDER, 196 OKL. 406, 165 P.2d 628 (1946). IT IS THE HOLDING OF TWO OFFICES THAT IS PROHIBITED AND IT IS IMMATERIAL THAT EITHER ONE OR BOTH ARE PAID OR UNPAID. CITE: OPINION NO. 67-171, 11 Ohio S
Summary: OPINION — AG — **** ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY — DUAL OFFICES **** AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAN RUN FOR ANOTHER OFFICE, BUT UPON HIS ELECTION AND ENTERING THE DUTIES OF THE SECOND OFFICE, HE WOULD IPSO FACTO VACATE THE OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNDER THE RULE SET FORTH IN " GIBSON V. CROWDER, 196 OKL. 406, 165 P.2d 628 (1946). IT IS THE HOLDING OF TWO OFFICES THAT IS PROHIBITED AND IT IS IMMATERIAL THAT EITHER ONE OR BOTH ARE PAID OR UNPAID. CITE: OPINION NO. 67-171, 11 Ohio St..
More
OPINION — AG — **** ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY — DUAL OFFICES **** AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAN RUN FOR ANOTHER OFFICE, BUT UPON HIS ELECTION AND ENTERING THE DUTIES OF THE SECOND OFFICE, HE WOULD IPSO FACTO VACATE THE OFFICE OF ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNDER THE RULE SET FORTH IN " GIBSON V. CROWDER, 196 OKL. 406, 165 P.2d 628
(1946). IT IS THE HOLDING OF TWO OFFICES THAT IS PROHIBITED AND IT IS IMMATERIAL THAT EITHER ONE OR BOTH ARE PAID OR UNPAID. CITE: OPINION NO. 67-171, 11 Ohio St. 1961, 558-562 [11-558] — [11-562], ARTICLE XVIII, SECTION 3(B), 51 Ohio St. 1961 6 [51-6] (DUANE LOBAUGH) ** SEE: GRAND JURY OF MCCURTAIN COUNTY V. CECIL, 679 P.2d 1308 (1983) ** ** SEE OPINION NO. 92-502 (1992) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 74-118 (1974) ** ** SEE: OPINION NO. 70-299 (1970) **
Source: CourtListener
