Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1963)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 07, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — YOUR QUESTION, AS STATED, WILL NOT PERMIT AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE ANSWER; THAT THE DETERMINATION OF LEGALITY OR ILLEGALITY IN THE PREMISES IN PURELY ONE FACT. . . I.E., IF THE PARTY IN QUESTION ACTUALLY "DEVOTED" TO THE WORK OF THE BOARD TEN DAYS EACH MONTH FOR THE PERIOD SINCE 1959, THEN THE $150.00 PER MONTH WAS "LEGALLY DRAWN BY HIM". IF SAID PARTY HAS NOT "DEVOTED TO THE WORK OF THE BOARD" TEN DAYS A MONTH SINCE 1959, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT HE HAS NOT, SUCH PAYMENT WAS NOT
More

OPINION — AG — YOUR QUESTION, AS STATED, WILL NOT PERMIT AN AFFIRMATIVE OR NEGATIVE ANSWER; THAT THE DETERMINATION OF LEGALITY OR ILLEGALITY IN THE PREMISES IN PURELY ONE FACT. . . I.E., IF THE PARTY IN QUESTION ACTUALLY "DEVOTED" TO THE WORK OF THE BOARD TEN DAYS EACH MONTH FOR THE PERIOD SINCE 1959, THEN THE $150.00 PER MONTH WAS "LEGALLY DRAWN BY HIM". IF SAID PARTY HAS NOT "DEVOTED TO THE WORK OF THE BOARD" TEN DAYS A MONTH SINCE 1959, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT HE HAS NOT, SUCH PAYMENT WAS NOT "LEGALLY DRAWN BY HIM." (CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE MERIT BOARD — UNLAWFUL COMPENSATION) CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1961 804 [74-804], 74 Ohio St. 1961 805 [74-805] (BURCK BAILEY)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer