Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No. 75-164, (1975)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 05, 1975
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** MANICURING — COSMETOLOGY ** THE AFFIXING OF ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS TO THE FINGERS OF CUSTOMERS IN A COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT, WHERE THE NATURAL NAILS ARE BUFFED OR OTHERWISE TREATED PRIOR TO SUCH AFFIXATION, CONSTITUTES MANICURING AS THAT TERM IS UTILIZED IN THE OKLAHOMA COSMETOLOGY ACT. CITE: 59 Ohio St. 1971 199.1 [ 59-199.1 ] (JAMES R. BARNETT)

OPINION — AG — ** MANICURING — COSMETOLOGY ** THE AFFIXING OF ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS TO THE FINGERS OF CUSTOMERS IN A COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT, WHERE THE NATURAL NAILS ARE BUFFED OR OTHERWISE TREATED PRIOR TO SUCH AFFIXATION, CONSTITUTES MANICURING AS THAT TERM IS UTILIZED IN THE OKLAHOMA COSMETOLOGY ACT. CITE: 59 Ohio St. 1971 199.1 [59-199.1] (JAMES R. BARNETT)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer