Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Opinion No. 51-0426, (1951)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 26, 1951
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** SHERIFF — FEEDING OF PRISONERS — REIMBURSEMENT ** (1) HOUSE BILL NO. TEN AUTHORIZES AND PROVIDES A SCALE WITH MAXIMUM PER DIEM PRICES FOR THE FEEDING OF PRISONERS BY THE SHERIFF; (2) THAT THE ITEMIZED FIGURES SHOWING THE SHERIFF'S COSTS FOR THE PERIOD CLAIMED ARE 'NOT' BY LAW REQUIRED TO BE PART OF SAID CLAIM; (3) THAT THE SUM AND AMOUNT TO BE CHARGED AND COLLECTED FOR SAID SERVICES (NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM AS PROVIDED BY LAW) RESTS IN THE SOUND DISCRETION OF THE BOARD OF COU
More

OPINION — AG — ** SHERIFF — FEEDING OF PRISONERS — REIMBURSEMENT ** (1) HOUSE BILL NO. TEN AUTHORIZES AND PROVIDES A SCALE WITH MAXIMUM PER DIEM PRICES FOR THE FEEDING OF PRISONERS BY THE SHERIFF; (2) THAT THE ITEMIZED FIGURES SHOWING THE SHERIFF'S COSTS FOR THE PERIOD CLAIMED ARE 'NOT' BY LAW REQUIRED TO BE PART OF SAID CLAIM; (3) THAT THE SUM AND AMOUNT TO BE CHARGED AND COLLECTED FOR SAID SERVICES (NOT TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM AS PROVIDED BY LAW) RESTS IN THE SOUND DISCRETION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AS JUSTIFIED BY ALL FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES; (4) THAT SUCH SUCCESSIVE CLAIMS ARE EACH TO BEAR THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY. (EXPENSES, MAINTENANCE, COUNTY JAIL) CITE: 19 Ohio St. 180.43 [19-180.43] (MAC Q. WILLIAMSON)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer