Opinion No., (1966)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 08, 1966
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — THE AMOUNT OF A JURY VERDICT IN EXCESS OF THAT SUM FIXED BY THE CONDEMNATION COMMISSIONERS IN AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING INSTITUTED BY A COUNTY SHOULD BE PAID FROM THE BOND FUND CREATED BY SALE OF BONDS PROPERLY AND LEGALLY VOTED FOR PURPOSE WHICH INCLUDED PAYMENT OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS IN THE PROJECT CONCERNED IN THE BOND ISSUE, AND WHEN SAID BOND FUND IS EXHAUSTED, FROM THE SINKING FUND PURSUANT TO 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.5 [ 62-365.5 ] AND 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.6 [ 62-
Summary: OPINION — AG — THE AMOUNT OF A JURY VERDICT IN EXCESS OF THAT SUM FIXED BY THE CONDEMNATION COMMISSIONERS IN AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING INSTITUTED BY A COUNTY SHOULD BE PAID FROM THE BOND FUND CREATED BY SALE OF BONDS PROPERLY AND LEGALLY VOTED FOR PURPOSE WHICH INCLUDED PAYMENT OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS IN THE PROJECT CONCERNED IN THE BOND ISSUE, AND WHEN SAID BOND FUND IS EXHAUSTED, FROM THE SINKING FUND PURSUANT TO 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.5 [ 62-365.5 ] AND 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.6 [ 62-3..
More
OPINION — AG — THE AMOUNT OF A JURY VERDICT IN EXCESS OF THAT SUM FIXED BY THE CONDEMNATION COMMISSIONERS IN AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING INSTITUTED BY A COUNTY SHOULD BE PAID FROM THE BOND FUND CREATED BY SALE OF BONDS PROPERLY AND LEGALLY VOTED FOR PURPOSE WHICH INCLUDED PAYMENT OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS IN THE PROJECT CONCERNED IN THE BOND ISSUE, AND WHEN SAID BOND FUND IS EXHAUSTED, FROM THE SINKING FUND PURSUANT TO 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.5 [62-365.5] AND 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.6 [62-365.6] CITE: 62 Ohio St. 1961 361-365.6 [62-361] — [62-365.6], 62 Ohio St. 1961 365.6 [62-365.6] (FINIS STEWART)
Source: CourtListener
