Opinion No., (1963)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 22, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "IS THE ORIGINAL LAW COVERING CHIROPRACTIC ( 59 Ohio St. 1951 164 [ 59-164 ]) ENCLUDED IN 1921, THE TERM SPINOGRAPHY, IS ONE OF THE SUBJECTS FOR EXAMINATIONS. IN JANUARY 1938 THE CHANGE WAS MADE TO READ ROENTGENOLOGY. ( 59 Ohio St. 1951 164 [ 59-164 ](B)) — ARE WE RIGHT IN ASSUMING THAT THE WORD ROENTGENOLOGY, SUPERSEDES OR RENDERS OBSOLETE THE FORMER TERMINOLOGY OR SPINOGRAPHY " — NEGATIVE CITE: 61 Ohio St. 1961 164 [61-164](A) (FRED HANSEN)
OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "IS THE ORIGINAL LAW COVERING CHIROPRACTIC (59 Ohio St. 1951 164 [59-164]) ENCLUDED IN 1921, THE TERM SPINOGRAPHY, IS ONE OF THE SUBJECTS FOR EXAMINATIONS. IN JANUARY 1938 THE CHANGE WAS MADE TO READ ROENTGENOLOGY. (59 Ohio St. 1951 164 [59-164](B)) — ARE WE RIGHT IN ASSUMING THAT THE WORD ROENTGENOLOGY, SUPERSEDES OR RENDERS OBSOLETE THE FORMER TERMINOLOGY OR SPINOGRAPHY?" — NEGATIVE CITE: 61 Ohio St. 1961 164 [61-164](A) (FRED HANSEN)
Source: CourtListener
