Opinion No., (1967)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 06, 1967
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ADDITIONAL MONEY PAID TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR DEPENDENCY HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE COVERAGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN INCREASE IN THE BASE SALARY OF CITY FIREMEN BY WHICH PERSONS RECEIVING PENSIONS UNDER THE FIREMEN'S RELIEF AND PENSION FUND SHOULD HAVE THEIR PENSIONS INCREASED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 11 Ohio St. 1965 Supp., 389 [11-389], AMENDED IN H.B. NO. 676, 1ST SESSION, 31ST LEGISLATURE. (PENN LERBLANCE)
OPINION — AG — ADDITIONAL MONEY PAID TO COMPENSATE EMPLOYEES FOR DEPENDENCY HOSPITALIZATION INSURANCE COVERAGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN INCREASE IN THE BASE SALARY OF CITY FIREMEN BY WHICH PERSONS RECEIVING PENSIONS UNDER THE FIREMEN'S RELIEF AND PENSION FUND SHOULD HAVE THEIR PENSIONS INCREASED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 11 Ohio St. 1965 Supp., 389 [11-389], AMENDED IN H.B. NO. 676, 1ST SESSION, 31ST LEGISLATURE. (PENN LERBLANCE)
Source: CourtListener
