Opinion No., (1980)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 10
Judges: JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: Oct. 17, 1980
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 21 Ohio St. 1971 61.1 [ 21-61.1 ], AND FOR PURPOSE OF CALCULATING THE DATE OF DISCHARGE, A JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE WHICH SPECIFIES THAT THE SENTENCE IS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH A PRIOR UNCOMPLETED SENTENCE SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE IT IS RECEIVED AT THE STATE PENAL INSTITUTION, AND (2) WHERE CONCURRENT SENTENCES ARE IMPOSED FOR TWO(2) OR MORE CRIMES IN THE SAME PROCEEDINGS OR COURT OR IN DIFFERENT PROCEEDINGS OR COURTS, THE SENTENCES RUN TOGETHER DURING
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 21 Ohio St. 1971 61.1 [ 21-61.1 ], AND FOR PURPOSE OF CALCULATING THE DATE OF DISCHARGE, A JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE WHICH SPECIFIES THAT THE SENTENCE IS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH A PRIOR UNCOMPLETED SENTENCE SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE IT IS RECEIVED AT THE STATE PENAL INSTITUTION, AND (2) WHERE CONCURRENT SENTENCES ARE IMPOSED FOR TWO(2) OR MORE CRIMES IN THE SAME PROCEEDINGS OR COURT OR IN DIFFERENT PROCEEDINGS OR COURTS, THE SENTENCES RUN TOGETHER DURING T..
More
OPINION — AG — (1) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 21 Ohio St. 1971 61.1 [21-61.1], AND FOR PURPOSE OF CALCULATING THE DATE OF DISCHARGE, A JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE WHICH SPECIFIES THAT THE SENTENCE IS TO RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH A PRIOR UNCOMPLETED SENTENCE SHALL COMMENCE ON THE DATE IT IS RECEIVED AT THE STATE PENAL INSTITUTION, AND (2) WHERE CONCURRENT SENTENCES ARE IMPOSED FOR TWO(2) OR MORE CRIMES IN THE SAME PROCEEDINGS OR COURT OR IN DIFFERENT PROCEEDINGS OR COURTS, THE SENTENCES RUN TOGETHER DURING THE TIME THAT THE PERIODS OVERLAP; AND THE NEW OR LONGER TERM DOES NOT TERMINATE AT THE SAME TIME AS THE PRIOR OR SHORTER TERM. CITE: 21 Ohio St. 1979 Supp., 61.1 [21-61.1], 57 Ohio St. 1971 138 [57-138] (JANET L. COX)
Source: CourtListener
