Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1967)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 22, 1967
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "CERTAIN TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TULSA COUNTY HAVE QUESTIONED THE AUTHORITY OF AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO ACT AS A TRUSTEE OF SAID SYSTEM IN THE ABSENCE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY." _ A QUALIFIED ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED TO PERFORM EVERY ACT THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO PERFORM. CITE: 19 Ohio St. 1961 952 [ 19-952 ], 19 Ohio St. 1965 Supp., 215.16 [ 19-215.16 ], OPINION NO. 66-412 (BRIAN UPP) ** SEE: OPI
More

OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "CERTAIN TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF TULSA COUNTY HAVE QUESTIONED THE AUTHORITY OF AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO ACT AS A TRUSTEE OF SAID SYSTEM IN THE ABSENCE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY." _ A QUALIFIED ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED TO PERFORM EVERY ACT THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO PERFORM. CITE: 19 Ohio St. 1961 952 [19-952], 19 Ohio St. 1965 Supp., 215.16 [19-215.16], OPINION NO. 66-412 (BRIAN UPP) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 69-185 (1969) **

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer