Opinion No. 52-0119 Ag, (1952)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 19, 1952
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: ** STENOGRAPHER — AUTHORITY — COURT CLERK TO FURNISH ** QUESTION: DOES THE COUNTY JUDGE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A COUNTY COURT STENOGRAPHER, HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND THAT THE COURT CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OR HIS DEPUTY, DO HIS (COUNT JUDGE) STENOGRAPHIC WORK ANSWER: NEGATIVE (SALARY/DUAL) CITE: 19 Ohio St. 179 .1 [ 19-179.1 ]/ 19 Ohio St. 179 .7 [ 19-179.7 ] /19 O.S. 222 [ 19-222 ]/20 O.S. 311 [ 20-311 ]/OPINION NO. NOVEMBER 3, 1950 — CAMPBELL (JAMES P. GARRETT)
** STENOGRAPHER — AUTHORITY — COURT CLERK TO FURNISH ** QUESTION: DOES THE COUNTY JUDGE, IN THE ABSENCE OF A COUNTY COURT STENOGRAPHER, HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND THAT THE COURT CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OR HIS DEPUTY, DO HIS (COUNT JUDGE) STENOGRAPHIC WORK? ANSWER: NEGATIVE (SALARY/DUAL) CITE: 19 Ohio St. 179.1 [19-179.1]/19 Ohio St. 179.7 [19-179.7] /19 O.S. 222 [19-222]/20 O.S. 311 [20-311]/OPINION NO. NOVEMBER 3, 1950 — CAMPBELL (JAMES P. GARRETT)
Source: CourtListener
