Opinion No., (1963)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 30, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — 43 Ohio St. 1961 7 [ 43-7 ] AUTHORIZES BUT "DOES NOT MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL DUTY" OF A COUNTY JUDGE TO PERFORM MARRIAGE CEREMONY, THAT HE MUST CHARGE AND ACCOUNT FOR THE FEE SPECIFIED BY STATUTE RELATIVE TO THE MARRIAGE LICENSE, BUT THAT IF, UPON REQUEST, HE CHOOSES TO SOLEMNIZE A PARTICULAR MARRIAGE, HE MAY RETAIN THE FEE CHARGED FOR SUCH SERVICES. CITE: OPINION NO. APRIL 27, 1953 — MORRIS, 28 Ohio St. 1961 42 [ 28-42 ], HOUSE BILL NO. 625 (CHARLES OWENS) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 68-297
Summary: OPINION — AG — 43 Ohio St. 1961 7 [ 43-7 ] AUTHORIZES BUT "DOES NOT MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL DUTY" OF A COUNTY JUDGE TO PERFORM MARRIAGE CEREMONY, THAT HE MUST CHARGE AND ACCOUNT FOR THE FEE SPECIFIED BY STATUTE RELATIVE TO THE MARRIAGE LICENSE, BUT THAT IF, UPON REQUEST, HE CHOOSES TO SOLEMNIZE A PARTICULAR MARRIAGE, HE MAY RETAIN THE FEE CHARGED FOR SUCH SERVICES. CITE: OPINION NO. APRIL 27, 1953 — MORRIS, 28 Ohio St. 1961 42 [ 28-42 ], HOUSE BILL NO. 625 (CHARLES OWENS) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 68-297 (..
More
OPINION — AG — 43 Ohio St. 1961 7 [43-7] AUTHORIZES BUT "DOES NOT MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL DUTY" OF A COUNTY JUDGE TO PERFORM MARRIAGE CEREMONY, THAT HE MUST CHARGE AND ACCOUNT FOR THE FEE SPECIFIED BY STATUTE RELATIVE TO THE MARRIAGE LICENSE, BUT THAT IF, UPON REQUEST, HE CHOOSES TO SOLEMNIZE A PARTICULAR MARRIAGE, HE MAY RETAIN THE FEE CHARGED FOR SUCH SERVICES. CITE: OPINION NO. APRIL 27, 1953 — MORRIS, 28 Ohio St. 1961 42 [28-42], HOUSE BILL NO. 625 (CHARLES OWENS) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 68-297 (1969) **
Source: CourtListener
