Opinion No., (1963)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 06, 1963
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WITHIN ITS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO ALLOW THE CLAIM BY THOMAS BROTHERS LUMBER COMPANY, WILBURTON, OKLAHOMA, FOR MATERIALS DELIVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF 1960-61; ALSO, IF WE ARE WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, DO WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUEST THE BUDGET OFFICE AND THAT STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS TO ALLOW THE SAID CLAIM " — (SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 34) — NEGATIVE CITE: ARTICLE X, SECTION 23 (HARVEY CODY)
OPINION — AG — QUESTION: "IS THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD WITHIN ITS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO ALLOW THE CLAIM BY THOMAS BROTHERS LUMBER COMPANY, WILBURTON, OKLAHOMA, FOR MATERIALS DELIVERED DURING THE PERIOD OF 1960-61; ALSO, IF WE ARE WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, DO WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUEST THE BUDGET OFFICE AND THAT STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS TO ALLOW THE SAID CLAIM?" — (SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 34) — NEGATIVE CITE: ARTICLE X, SECTION 23 (HARVEY CODY)
Source: CourtListener
