Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No. 49-0721 Ag, (1942)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 21, 1942
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** CANDIDATES — NO OPPOSITION — BALLOT — NAME ** IN MAYES COUNTY ALL OF THE NOMINEES OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR COUNTY OFFICE WHO ARE REQUIRED TO BE VOTED THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY AT LARGE, HAVE NO OPPOSITION IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. YOU STATE THAT ONLY ONE NOMINEE IN COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT NO. 3 HAS OPPOSITION; DOES THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD HAVE TO PRINT COUNTY BALLOTS WHERE ALL COUNTY CANDIDATES ARE UNOPPOSED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION EXCEPT THE CANDIDATES IN THE ONE COMMISSI
More

OPINION — AG — ** CANDIDATES — NO OPPOSITION — BALLOT — NAME ** IN MAYES COUNTY ALL OF THE NOMINEES OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR COUNTY OFFICE WHO ARE REQUIRED TO BE VOTED THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY AT LARGE, HAVE NO OPPOSITION IN THE GENERAL ELECTION. YOU STATE THAT ONLY ONE NOMINEE IN COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT NO. 3 HAS OPPOSITION; DOES THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD HAVE TO PRINT COUNTY BALLOTS WHERE ALL COUNTY CANDIDATES ARE UNOPPOSED IN THE GENERAL ELECTION EXCEPT THE CANDIDATES IN THE ONE COMMISSIONERS DISTRICT ? — AFFIRMATIVE (ELECTION) CITE: 26 Ohio St. 162 [26-162], 26 Ohio St. 166 [26-166], 26 Ohio St. 167 [26-167] (RANDELL S. COBB)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer