Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1951)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 14, 1951
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** COUNTY TAX LEVY — MILL LEVY ** A COUNTY WOULD 'NOT' BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS APPROPRIATE IN HOUSE BILL NO. 36, ONE OF THE FISCAL YEARS INVOLVED THEREIN, UNLESS SUCH COUNTY PROVIDES LOCAL FUNDS, IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN SECT. 4, OF SAID ACT, TO FINANCE ITS HEALTH DEPARTMENT DURING SUCH FISCAL YEAR BUT THAT SAID ACT DOES 'NOT' PURPORTED TO MAKE SUCH PARTICIPATION MANDATORY. (PER CAPITA ASSESSED VALUATION, AD VALOREM, COUNTY HEALTH DEPA
More

OPINION — AG — ** COUNTY TAX LEVY — MILL LEVY ** A COUNTY WOULD 'NOT' BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS APPROPRIATE IN HOUSE BILL NO. 36, ONE OF THE FISCAL YEARS INVOLVED THEREIN, UNLESS SUCH COUNTY PROVIDES LOCAL FUNDS, IN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN SECT. 4, OF SAID ACT, TO FINANCE ITS HEALTH DEPARTMENT DURING SUCH FISCAL YEAR BUT THAT SAID ACT DOES 'NOT' PURPORTED TO MAKE SUCH PARTICIPATION MANDATORY. (PER CAPITA ASSESSED VALUATION, AD VALOREM, COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, ONE HALF MILL) CITE: 63 Ohio St. 510 [63-510], 63 Ohio St. 516 [63-516] [63-516], 74 Ohio St. 284 [74-284] (JAMES C. HARKIN)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer