Opinion No. Ag, (1949)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 27, 1949
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** SUMMONS — PRIVATE PROPERTY — SERVICE ** QUESTION: I HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO ASK THE AG FOR AN OPINION CONCERNING THE RIGHT OF A SHERIFF OR HIS DEPUTY TO SERVE AN EMPLOYEE WHILE AT WORK WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE BUILDING AND PROPERTY OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION IRRESPECTIVE OF THE CONTRARY WISHES OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION. (MOLESTATION, SUMMONS, LEGAL ACTION, LITIGATION, PRIVATE CORPORATION, PUBLIC OFFICIALS) CITE: 12 Ohio St. 155 [ 12-155 ], 12 Ohio St. 158 [ 12-158 ], 19 Ohio
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** SUMMONS — PRIVATE PROPERTY — SERVICE ** QUESTION: I HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO ASK THE AG FOR AN OPINION CONCERNING THE RIGHT OF A SHERIFF OR HIS DEPUTY TO SERVE AN EMPLOYEE WHILE AT WORK WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE BUILDING AND PROPERTY OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION IRRESPECTIVE OF THE CONTRARY WISHES OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION. (MOLESTATION, SUMMONS, LEGAL ACTION, LITIGATION, PRIVATE CORPORATION, PUBLIC OFFICIALS) CITE: 12 Ohio St. 155 [ 12-155 ], 12 Ohio St. 158 [ 12-158 ], 19 Ohio S..
More
OPINION — AG — ** SUMMONS — PRIVATE PROPERTY — SERVICE ** QUESTION: I HAVE BEEN REQUESTED TO ASK THE AG FOR AN OPINION CONCERNING THE RIGHT OF A SHERIFF OR HIS DEPUTY TO SERVE AN EMPLOYEE WHILE AT WORK WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE BUILDING AND PROPERTY OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION IRRESPECTIVE OF THE CONTRARY WISHES OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION. (MOLESTATION, SUMMONS, LEGAL ACTION, LITIGATION, PRIVATE CORPORATION, PUBLIC OFFICIALS) CITE: 12 Ohio St. 155 [12-155], 12 Ohio St. 158 [12-158], 19 Ohio St. 541 [19-541] (SAM H. LATTIMORE)
Source: CourtListener
