Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1974)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 06, 1974
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD — UNGRADING SALARIES ** IF THE PRESENTLY EMPLOYED INTERVIEWERS DO 'NOT' POSSESS THE NECESSARY QUALIFICATION AS SET FORTH IN HOUSE BILL NO. 1546, NOW CODIFIED AS 57 Ohio St. 357 [ 57-357 ], THEY 'MUST' BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH SALARY PROVISIONS AS SCHEDULED PRIOR TO PASSAGE OF SAID ACT, AND ANY RAISES MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT SCHEDULE. IN THE EVENT SAID SCHEDULE PROVIDES FOR THE SALARY INCREASES TO $10,500.00 AFTER ONE YEAR'S EMPLOYMENT IT IS LEG
More

OPINION — AG — ** PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD — UNGRADING SALARIES ** IF THE PRESENTLY EMPLOYED INTERVIEWERS DO 'NOT' POSSESS THE NECESSARY QUALIFICATION AS SET FORTH IN HOUSE BILL NO. 1546, NOW CODIFIED AS 57 Ohio St. 357 [57-357], THEY 'MUST' BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH SALARY PROVISIONS AS SCHEDULED PRIOR TO PASSAGE OF SAID ACT, AND ANY RAISES MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT SCHEDULE. IN THE EVENT SAID SCHEDULE PROVIDES FOR THE SALARY INCREASES TO $10,500.00 AFTER ONE YEAR'S EMPLOYMENT IT IS LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT THAT INCREASE. HOWEVER, IF THE SCHEDULE DOES 'NOT' SO PROVIDE, ANY SALARY INCREASE MUST BE IN INCREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE SCHEDULE IN EFFECT PRIOR TO THE PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL NO. 1546. (SALARY, APPROPRIATION, EMPLOYEES) CITE: 57 Ohio St. 357 [57-357] (MICHAEL CAUTHRON)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer