Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opinion No., (1969)

Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports Number:  Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 10, 1969
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — **** CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE — OFFICE — CANDIDATE **** WHETHER OR NOT AN OFFICE IS A "PAID PUBLIC OFFICE" WITHIN THE PROHIBITION OF 74 Ohio St. 1961 SECTION 818[ 74-818 ] [ 74-818 ] DEPENDS UPON WHETHER THE PAY IS FOR SERVICES RENDERED OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES INCURRED BY EMPLOYEE. WHETHER INCOME IS TAXABLE OR IS WAIVED IS IMMATERIAL. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST A PERSON IN THE CLASSIFIED SERVICE BEING "A CANDIDATE FOR NOMINATION OR ELECTION TO ANY PAID PUBLIC OFFICE" WOULD ALSO APPL
More

OPINION — AG — **** CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE — OFFICE — CANDIDATE **** WHETHER OR NOT AN OFFICE IS A "PAID PUBLIC OFFICE" WITHIN THE PROHIBITION OF 74 Ohio St. 1961 SECTION 818[74-818] [74-818] DEPENDS UPON WHETHER THE PAY IS FOR SERVICES RENDERED OR REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES INCURRED BY EMPLOYEE. WHETHER INCOME IS TAXABLE OR IS WAIVED IS IMMATERIAL. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST A PERSON IN THE CLASSIFIED SERVICE BEING "A CANDIDATE FOR NOMINATION OR ELECTION TO ANY PAID PUBLIC OFFICE" WOULD ALSO APPLY TO SUCH AN EMPLOYEE BEING APPOINTED TO FILL OUT THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF A PAID PUBLIC OFFICER WHERE SUCH EMPLOYEE ACTUALLY ASSUMES THE PAID PUBLIC OFFICE W. J. MONROE

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer