Opinion No. Ag, (1984)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 12
Judges: MICHAEL C. TURPEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: Oct. 30, 1984
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** TRAVEL — REIMBURSEMENT — EMPLOYEES ** (1) THE PROVISIONS OF SENATE BILL NO. 527, TO BE CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500 .8 [ 74-500.8 ] AND 74 Ohio St. 500 .9 [ 74-500.9 ](B), ARE NOT MANDATORY WITH A STATE AGENCY. (2) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE "STATE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT ACT", CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] ET SEQ., THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES AND PERMANENT EMPLOYEES. (PER DIEM, TRAVEL STATUS, STATE EMPLOYE
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** TRAVEL — REIMBURSEMENT — EMPLOYEES ** (1) THE PROVISIONS OF SENATE BILL NO. 527, TO BE CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500 .8 [ 74-500.8 ] AND 74 Ohio St. 500 .9 [ 74-500.9 ](B), ARE NOT MANDATORY WITH A STATE AGENCY. (2) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE "STATE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT ACT", CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] ET SEQ., THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES AND PERMANENT EMPLOYEES. (PER DIEM, TRAVEL STATUS, STATE EMPLOYEE..
More
OPINION — AG — ** TRAVEL — REIMBURSEMENT — EMPLOYEES ** (1) THE PROVISIONS OF SENATE BILL NO. 527, TO BE CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500.8 [74-500.8] AND 74 Ohio St. 500.9 [74-500.9](B), ARE NOT MANDATORY WITH A STATE AGENCY. (2) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE "STATE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT ACT", CODIFIED AT 74 Ohio St. 500.1 [74-500.1] ET SEQ., THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN THE AMOUNT OF TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES AND PERMANENT EMPLOYEES. (PER DIEM, TRAVEL STATUS, STATE EMPLOYEE, LODGING, EXPENSES, TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES) CITE: 74 Ohio St. 500.8 [74-500.8], 74 Ohio St. 500.1 [74-500.1], 74 Ohio St. 840.3 [74-840.3](2) (RICHARD MILDREN)
Source: CourtListener
