Opinion No., (1980)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 17
Judges: JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Filed: Aug. 21, 1980
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) A STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ANOTHER STATE AGENCY, EITHER AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR THROUGH ANY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE IN WHICH THE EMPLOYEE HOLDS A SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL INTEREST (AS DEFINED IN 74 Ohio St. 1971 1403 [ 74-1403 ](C)) TO FURNISH SAID AGENCY CONSULTANT SERVICES. (2) A FULL TIME STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT BE PAID CONSULTANT FEES BY ANOTHER STATE AGENCY. CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1979 Supp., 1404 [ 74-1404 ], OPINION NO. 75-146, 74 Ohi
Summary: OPINION — AG — (1) A STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ANOTHER STATE AGENCY, EITHER AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR THROUGH ANY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE IN WHICH THE EMPLOYEE HOLDS A SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL INTEREST (AS DEFINED IN 74 Ohio St. 1971 1403 [ 74-1403 ](C)) TO FURNISH SAID AGENCY CONSULTANT SERVICES. (2) A FULL TIME STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT BE PAID CONSULTANT FEES BY ANOTHER STATE AGENCY. CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1979 Supp., 1404 [ 74-1404 ], OPINION NO. 75-146, 74 Ohio..
More
OPINION — AG — (1) A STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ANOTHER STATE AGENCY, EITHER AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR THROUGH ANY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE IN WHICH THE EMPLOYEE HOLDS A SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL INTEREST (AS DEFINED IN 74 Ohio St. 1971 1403 [74-1403](C)) TO FURNISH SAID AGENCY CONSULTANT SERVICES. (2) A FULL TIME STATE EMPLOYEE OF ONE AGENCY MAY NOT BE PAID CONSULTANT FEES BY ANOTHER STATE AGENCY. CITE: 74 Ohio St. 1979 Supp., 1404 [74-1404], OPINION NO. 75-146, 74 Ohio St. 1971 1405 [74-1405](A) (DUAL COMPENSATION, CONFLICT OF INTEREST) (FLOYD W. TAYLOR) == WITHDRAWN BY 88-023 TO EXTENT IT CONFLICTS ** NOTE, NOTE : WITHDRAWN BY OPINION NO. 92-022 (1993) ** ** SEE OPINION NO. 91-634 (1991) ** SEE OPINION NO. 87-534 (1987) **
Source: CourtListener
