Opinion No., (1951)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 27, 1951
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — ** TAX — FEES — COUNTY OFFICERS ** NEITHER THE COURT CLERK OF TULSA COUNTY, NOR ANY DEPUTY APPOINTED SUCH CLERK, IS A DEPUTY, ASSISTANT, SIDE, STENOGRAPHER, TECHNICIAN OR OTHER SUBORDINATE EMPLOYEE IN THE OFFICE OF JUDGE OR THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT, WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 Ohio St. 179 .1 [ 19-179.1 ] (SALARIES, WAGES, EMPLOYEES OF THE COURT POSITIONS) CITE: 20 Ohio St. 662 [ 20-662 ], ARTICLE V, SECTION 57 (JAMES C. HARKIN)
OPINION — AG — ** TAX — FEES — COUNTY OFFICERS ** NEITHER THE COURT CLERK OF TULSA COUNTY, NOR ANY DEPUTY APPOINTED SUCH CLERK, IS A DEPUTY, ASSISTANT, SIDE, STENOGRAPHER, TECHNICIAN OR OTHER SUBORDINATE EMPLOYEE IN THE OFFICE OF JUDGE OR THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT, WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 Ohio St. 179.1 [19-179.1] (SALARIES, WAGES, EMPLOYEES OF THE COURT POSITIONS) CITE: 20 Ohio St. 662 [20-662], ARTICLE V, SECTION 57 (JAMES C. HARKIN)
Source: CourtListener
