Opinion No., (1950)
Court: Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Number:
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jan. 12, 1950
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: OPINION — AG — *** STATE ELECTION BOARD — FILING — CANDIDATES ** 26 Ohio St. 162 [ 26-162 ] HOLDS THAT STATE OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE STATE ELECTION BOARD, WHILE COUNTY OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD. ALTHOUGH THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES WERE STATE OFFICERS, THE A.G. OFFICE RENDERED AN OPINION IN 1937 HOLDING THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES SHOULD FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, AS WE WERE ELECTED ON A COUNTY WIDE BASIS. . . DO WE NOW FILED WITH THE COUNTY ELE
Summary: OPINION — AG — *** STATE ELECTION BOARD — FILING — CANDIDATES ** 26 Ohio St. 162 [ 26-162 ] HOLDS THAT STATE OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE STATE ELECTION BOARD, WHILE COUNTY OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD. ALTHOUGH THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES WERE STATE OFFICERS, THE A.G. OFFICE RENDERED AN OPINION IN 1937 HOLDING THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES SHOULD FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, AS WE WERE ELECTED ON A COUNTY WIDE BASIS. . . DO WE NOW FILED WITH THE COUNTY ELEC..
More
OPINION — AG — *** STATE ELECTION BOARD — FILING — CANDIDATES ** 26 Ohio St. 162 [26-162] HOLDS THAT STATE OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE STATE ELECTION BOARD, WHILE COUNTY OFFICERS MUST FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD. ALTHOUGH THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES WERE STATE OFFICERS, THE A.G. OFFICE RENDERED AN OPINION IN 1937 HOLDING THAT SUPERIOR JUDGES SHOULD FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, AS WE WERE ELECTED ON A COUNTY WIDE BASIS. . . DO WE NOW FILED WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD OR THE STATE ELECTION BOARD ? — THEY SHOULD FILE WITH THE COUNTY ELECTION BOARD. (JUDGES, FILED, CANDIDATES, FILING, NOTIFICATION, STATE OFFICERS, PUBLIC OFFICER, ELECTION) CITE: 20 Ohio St. 141.1 [20-141.1], 26 Ohio St. 162 [26-162], OPINION NO. JUNE 27, 1930 — LUTTRELL, 26 Ohio St. 401 [26-401] (FRED HANSEN)
Source: CourtListener
