Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edgar M. Morsman, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Edgar M. Morsman v. David Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 581 (1931)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 581 Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 23, 1931
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 283 U.S. 783 51 S. Ct. 343 75 L. Ed. 1412 Edgar M. MORSMAN, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Edgar M. Morsman, petitioner, v. David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. No. 581. Supreme Court of the United States March 2, 1931 Mr. Edgar M. Morsman, Jr., of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner. The Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 The question in this case is that of the construction of section 302(c) of the Revenue Act of 1924, c. 234, 43 Stat. 253, 304 (26 USCA § 1094 note), a pro
More

283 U.S. 783

51 S. Ct. 343

75 L. Ed. 1412

Edgar M. MORSMAN, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Edgar M. Morsman, petitioner,
v.
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

No. 581.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 2, 1931

Mr. Edgar M. Morsman, Jr., of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.

The Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

1

The question in this case is that of the construction of section 302(c) of the Revenue Act of 1924, c. 234, 43 Stat. 253, 304 (26 USCA § 1094 note), a provision similar to that of section 402(c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional authority of the Congress to impose prosepctively a tax with respect to transfers or tursts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 44 F.(2d) 902 is reversed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U.S. 238, 50 S. Ct. 286, 74 L. Ed. 826, 67 A. L. R. 1244.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer