Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Catherine Schultz v. Live Stock National Bank of Chicago, Administrator, Etc., 671 (1938)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 671 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 17, 1938
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 302 U.S. 766 58 S. Ct. 481 82 L. Ed. 595 Catherine SCHULTZ, petitioner, v. LIVE STOCK NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Administrator, etc. * No. 671. Supreme Court of the United States January 17, 1938 1 Miss Catherine Schultz, pro se. 2 On petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of the State of Illinois, First District. 3 For opinion below, see 289 Ill.App. 626, 7 N.E.2d 636 . 4 The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upo
More

302 U.S. 766

58 S. Ct. 481

82 L. Ed. 595

Catherine SCHULTZ, petitioner,
v.
LIVE STOCK NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Administrator, etc.*

No. 671.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 17, 1938

1

Miss Catherine Schultz, pro se.

2

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of the State of Illinois, First District.

3

For opinion below, see 289 Ill.App. 626, 7 N.E.2d 636.

4

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

*

Rehearing denied 303 U.S. 666, 58 S. Ct. 609, 82 L.Ed. ——; 304 U.S. ——, 58 S. Ct. 1052, 82 L.Ed. ——; 305 U.S. ——, 59 S. Ct. 98, 83 L.Ed. ——.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer