Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Travia v. Lomenzo, 191 (1965)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 191 Visitors: 7
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Nov. 22, 1965
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 382 U.S. 9 (1965) TRAVIA ET AL. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. No. 191. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 11, 1965. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis
More
382 U.S. 9 (1965)

TRAVIA ET AL.
v.
LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

No. 191.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 11, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Solicitor General, Donald Zimmerman, Special Assistant Attorney General, George D. Zuckerman, Assistant Attorney General, and Willis Burton Lemon for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[For concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer