Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 271 87 S. Ct. 1033 18 L. Ed. 2d 40 John Edward DAUGHERTY v. CALIFORNIA. No. 19, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 John Edward Daugherty, pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are grant
Summary: 386 U.S. 271 87 S. Ct. 1033 18 L. Ed. 2d 40 John Edward DAUGHERTY v. CALIFORNIA. No. 19, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 John Edward Daugherty, pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are grante..
More
386 U.S. 271
87 S. Ct. 1033
18 L. Ed. 2d 40
John Edward DAUGHERTY
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 19, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 13, 1967
John Edward Daugherty, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. Anthony Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824.
2
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
