James Kinney Roy v. California, 68, Misc (1967)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 68, Misc
Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 386 U.S. 279 87 S. Ct. 1037 18 L. Ed. 2d 47 James Kinney ROY v. CALIFORNIA et al. No. 68, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 1
Summary: 386 U.S. 279 87 S. Ct. 1037 18 L. Ed. 2d 47 James Kinney ROY v. CALIFORNIA et al. No. 68, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States March 13, 1967 On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18..
More
386 U.S. 279
87 S. Ct. 1037
18 L. Ed. 2d 47
James Kinney ROY
v.
CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 68, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 13, 1967
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824.
2
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
Source: CourtListener
