Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gold v. DiCarlo, 901 (1965)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 901 Visitors: 20
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 26, 1965
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: 380 U.S. 520 (1965) GOLD ET AL. v. DICARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. No. 901. Supreme Court of United States. Decided April 26, 1965. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Jesse Moss for appellants. Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz
More
380 U.S. 520 (1965)

GOLD ET AL.
v.
DICARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

No. 901.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 26, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Jesse Moss for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer