Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-12809 Date Filed: 12/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-12809 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00208-JSM-AAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL TORRES-SOLIS, a.k.a. Manuelito, a.k.a. Charlie, a.k.a. Tio, a.k.a. Abuelo, a.k.a. Tunda, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 7, 2018) Case: 18-12809
Summary: Case: 18-12809 Date Filed: 12/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-12809 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00208-JSM-AAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL TORRES-SOLIS, a.k.a. Manuelito, a.k.a. Charlie, a.k.a. Tio, a.k.a. Abuelo, a.k.a. Tunda, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 7, 2018) Case: 18-12809 D..
More
Case: 18-12809 Date Filed: 12/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-12809
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00208-JSM-AAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL TORRES-SOLIS,
a.k.a. Manuelito,
a.k.a. Charlie,
a.k.a. Tio,
a.k.a. Abuelo,
a.k.a. Tunda,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 7, 2018)
Case: 18-12809 Date Filed: 12/07/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Before WILSON, NEWSOM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Bryant R. Camareno, appointed counsel for Manuel Torres-Solis in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Torres-Solis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2