Anderson v. Mendez, Warden, 02-9895 (2003)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 02-9895
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 19, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 538 U.S. 1028 ANDERSON v. MENDEZ, WARDEN. No. 02-9895. Supreme Court of United States. May 19, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee require
Summary: 538 U.S. 1028 ANDERSON v. MENDEZ, WARDEN. No. 02-9895. Supreme Court of United States. May 19, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required..
More
538 U.S. 1028
ANDERSON
v.
MENDEZ, WARDEN.
No. 02-9895.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 19, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
Source: CourtListener
