Eldridge v. United States, 03-5940 (2003)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 03-5940
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 06, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 540 U.S. 804 ELDRIDGE v. UNITED STATES. No. 03-5940. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the Ct. App. D. C. 2 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted
Summary: 540 U.S. 804 ELDRIDGE v. UNITED STATES. No. 03-5940. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the Ct. App. D. C. 2 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted i..
More
540 U.S. 804
ELDRIDGE
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 03-5940.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the Ct. App. D. C.
2
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 822 A.2d 1112.
Source: CourtListener
