Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Santoro v. United States, 1219 (1968)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 1219 Visitors: 6
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 10, 1968
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: 392 U.S. 301 (1968) SANTORO v. UNITED STATES. No. 1219. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1968. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Robert S. Bailey for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated
More
392 U.S. 301 (1968)

SANTORO
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 1219.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1968.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

Robert S. Bailey for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer