Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Keith Jelks, 18-13792 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 18-13792 Visitors: 70
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 18-13792 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00014-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEITH JELKS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (May 1, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Pa
More
           Case: 18-13792   Date Filed: 05/01/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 18-13792
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00014-MW-GRJ-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

KEITH JELKS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (May 1, 2019)

Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 18-13792    Date Filed: 05/01/2019   Page: 2 of 2


      Megan Saillant, appointed counsel for Keith Jelks in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Jelks’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer