Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10566 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20470-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE MARTIN PENA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 1, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, AND ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 17-10566 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20470-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE MARTIN PENA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 1, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, AND ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed couns..
More
Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10566
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20470-JAL-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JORGE MARTIN PENA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(May 1, 2019)
Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, AND ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Jorge Martin Pena in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Pena
Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 2 of 2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Pena has received notice of his right to respond to his counsel’s motion,
and has notified this Court that he does not intend to do so.
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pena’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2