Phelps v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, 03-9225 (2004)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 03-9225
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 19, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 541 U.S. 984 PHELPS v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. No. 03-9225. Supreme Court of United States. April 19, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted i
Summary: 541 U.S. 984 PHELPS v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. No. 03-9225. Supreme Court of United States. April 19, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in..
More
541 U.S. 984
PHELPS
v.
ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
No. 03-9225.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 19, 2004.
1
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 79 Fed. Appx. 606.
Source: CourtListener
