Granholm, Governor of Michigan v. Heald, 03-1116 (2004)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 03-1116
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 541 U.S. 1062 GRANHOLM, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL. v. HEALD ET AL. No. 03-1116. Supreme Court of United States. May 24, 2004. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment " Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted f
Summary: 541 U.S. 1062 GRANHOLM, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL. v. HEALD ET AL. No. 03-1116. Supreme Court of United States. May 24, 2004. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment " Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted fo..
More
541 U.S. 1062
GRANHOLM, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
v.
HEALD ET AL.
No. 03-1116.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 24, 2004.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?" Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120, 342 F.3d 517; No. 03-1274, 358 F.3d 223.
Source: CourtListener
