Briscoe v. Virginia, 07-11191 (2010)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 07-11191
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jan. 25, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 559 U. S. _ (2010) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _ No. 07–11191 _ MARK A. BRISCOE AND
Summary: (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 559 U. S. _ (2010) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _ No. 07–11191 _ MARK A. BRISCOE AND ..
More
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 559 U. S. ____ (2010) 1
Per Curiam
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to
notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash
ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order
that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 07–11191
_________________
MARK A. BRISCOE AND SHELDON A. CYPRESS,
PETITIONERS v. VIRGINIA
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
VIRGINIA
[January 25, 2010]
PER CURIAM.
We vacate the judgment of the Supreme Court of Vir
ginia and remand the case for further proceedings not
inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. Massa
chusetts, 557 U. S. ___ (2009).
It is so ordered.
Source: CourtListener
