McKinley v. Reilly, 1000 (1965)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number: 1000
Visitors: 23
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: May 17, 1965
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 381 U.S. 276 (1965) McKINLEY v. REILLY ET AL. No. 1000. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 17, 1965. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. Mark Wilmer for appellant. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
381 U.S. 276 (1965)
McKINLEY
v.
REILLY ET AL.
No. 1000.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided May 17, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
Mark Wilmer for appellant.
Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Source: CourtListener
