Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Griffith v. California, 457 (1960)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number: 457 Visitors: 9
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Dec. 05, 1960
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: 364 U.S. 476 (1960) GRIFFITH v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. No. 457. Supreme Court of United States. Decided December 5, 1960. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. J. B. Tietz for appellant. Robert E. Reed and R. B. Pegram for the State of California, and Roger Arneberg and Bourke Jones for the City of Los Angeles, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
364 U.S. 476 (1960)

GRIFFITH
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

No. 457.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 5, 1960.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.

J. B. Tietz for appellant.

Robert E. Reed and R. B. Pegram for the State of California, and Roger Arneberg and Bourke Jones for the City of Los Angeles, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer