The Patapsco, (1871)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 18, 1871
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 79 U.S. 451 (_) 12 Wall. 451 THE PATAPSCO. Supreme Court of United States. *452 On this state of facts, Mr. Orville Horwitz, for the appellee. [*] Mr. Donohue, contra. The CHIEF JUSTICE: The decree of the Circuit Court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th July, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. We think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. The sum thus computed exceeds $2000, and
Summary: 79 U.S. 451 (_) 12 Wall. 451 THE PATAPSCO. Supreme Court of United States. *452 On this state of facts, Mr. Orville Horwitz, for the appellee. [*] Mr. Donohue, contra. The CHIEF JUSTICE: The decree of the Circuit Court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th July, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. We think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. The sum thus computed exceeds $2000, and ..
More
79 U.S. 451 (____)
12 Wall. 451
THE PATAPSCO.
Supreme Court of United States.
On this state of facts, Mr. Orville Horwitz, for the appellee.[*]
Mr. Donohue, contra.
The CHIEF JUSTICE:
The decree of the Circuit Court was for the amount reported due the libellant on the 15th July, 1868, $1982, and interest from the date of the report. We think that interest to the date of the decree must be computed as a part of the sum for which the decree was rendered. The sum thus computed exceeds $2000, and the motion must, therefore, be
DENIED.
NOTES
[*] Citing Udall v. Ohio, 17 Howard, 17, and Olney v. Falcon, Ib. 19.
Source: CourtListener
