Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hinckley v. Gilman, C., & SR Co., (1877)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States Number:  Visitors: 29
Judges: Waite
Filed: Mar. 26, 1877
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 94 U.S. 467 (1876) HINCKLEY v. GILMAN, CLINTON, AND SPRINGFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY. Supreme Court of United States. *468 Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motion. Mr. H. Crawford and Mr. S.P. McConnell, contra. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court. The motion to dismiss cannot be sustained. In Blossom v. Railroad Company, 1 Wall. 655 , a bidder at a foreclosure sale was allowed to appeal, and in delivering the opinion of the court Mr. Justice Miller said: "It is certa
More
94 U.S. 467 (1876)

HINCKLEY
v.
GILMAN, CLINTON, AND SPRINGFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

*468 Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motion.

Mr. H. Crawford and Mr. S.P. McConnell, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to dismiss cannot be sustained.

In Blossom v. Railroad Company, 1 Wall. 655, a bidder at a foreclosure sale was allowed to appeal, and in delivering the opinion of the court Mr. Justice Miller said: —

"It is certainly true that he cannot appeal from the original decree of foreclosure, nor from any other order or decree of the court made prior to his bid. It, however, seems to be well settled, that, after a decree adjudicating certain rights between the parties to a suit, other persons having no previous interest in the litigation may become connected with the case in the course of the subsequent proceedings, in such a manner as to subject them to the jurisdiction of the court, and render them liable to its orders; and that they may in like manner acquire rights in regard to the subject-matter of the litigation, which the court is bound to protect."

*469 This seems to us to be decisive of this motion. The receiver cannot and does not attempt to appeal from the decree of foreclosure, or from any order or decree of the court, except such as relates to the settlement of his accounts. To that extent he has been subjected to the jurisdiction of the court, and made liable to its orders and decrees. He has, therefore, the corresponding right to contend against all claims made against him. For this purpose he occupies the position of a party to the suit, although an officer of the court, and after the final decree below has the right to his appeal here. In this case, the final decree has been given, and the case is properly here upon the appeal as prayed and allowed. This will not keep any thing in litigation but the receiver's accounts. The title to the property and the possession under the sale cannot be in any manner affected. Every thing can be closed up in the court below, in accordance with the decree which has been entered in the cause, except the distribution of the money claimed from the receiver.

It will be time enough to consider whether more of the record has been brought here than is necessary to the hearing of the questions presented by the appeal when the cause is reached, or when application is made to us in that behalf.

Motion to dismiss denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer