Ex Parte Cota, (1884)
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Number:
Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 04, 1884
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 110 U.S. 385 4 S. Ct. 25 28 L. Ed. 172 Ex parte COTA. February 4, 1884. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury , for respondent. No brief filed for petitioner. WAITE, C. J. 1 It was decided at the last term in Ex parte Tom Tong , 108 U. S. [S. C. 2 SUP. CT. REP. 871,] that this court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the pre
Summary: 110 U.S. 385 4 S. Ct. 25 28 L. Ed. 172 Ex parte COTA. February 4, 1884. Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury , for respondent. No brief filed for petitioner. WAITE, C. J. 1 It was decided at the last term in Ex parte Tom Tong , 108 U. S. [S. C. 2 SUP. CT. REP. 871,] that this court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the pres..
More
110 U.S. 385
4 S. Ct. 25
28 L. Ed. 172
Ex parte COTA.
February 4, 1884.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for respondent.
No brief filed for petitioner.
WAITE, C. J.
1
It was decided at the last term in Ex parte Tom Tong, 108 U. S. [S. C. 2 SUP. CT. REP. 871,] that this court could not take jurisdiction of a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of a circuit court in proceedings under a writ of habeas corpus until final judgment has been rendered in accordance with the opinion of the presiding justice or judge. This is such a case, and it is consequently remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings according to law.
Source: CourtListener
