Decision will be entered under
FOLEY,
During the years in issue, petitioner operated Bay Area Bee Busters, a bee and wasp removal business. Petitioner did not file Federal income tax returns or pay taxes relating to these years. Respondent analyzed petitioner's bank account and, using the bank deposits method, determined that petitioner received $44 in taxable interest relating to 2010 and had gross receipts of $328,404 and $416,900 relating to 2009 and 2010, respectively. Respondent prepared substitutes for returns and, on September 5, 2012, sent petitioner a notice of deficiency determining deficiencies of $108,772 and $139,948 relating to 2009 and 2010, respectively. In addition,2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 85">*86 respondent determined that petitioner was liable for additions to tax pursuant to
Respondent was entitled to use the bank deposits method to reconstruct petitioner's income.
Petitioner did not contest the
*87 Contentions2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 85">*87 we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or meritless.
To reflect the foregoing,
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect relating to the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.↩
2. Pursuant to