1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48">*48 Decision will be entered for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
POWELL, SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE: This case was heard pursuant to section 7443A(b)(3) and Rules 180, 181, and 182. 11998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48">*49
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's 1994 Federal income tax in the amount of $751. Petitioner resided in Winthrop, Massachusetts, at the time the petition was filed.
The sole issue is whether petitioner is entitled to exclude from gross income1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 48">*50 $5,000 paid to petitioner and Dartmouth College by the Globe Newspaper Co., the publisher of the Boston Globe (the Globe).
The facts are undisputed and may be summarized as follows. When petitioner was in secondary school he delivered newspapers for the Globe. During that time the Globe had a "Paper Route to College" program in which petitioner participated. Under the program, if petitioner delivered the Globe for 3 years, the Globe would pay $5,000 toward petitioner's first-year tuition at an accredited college or university. Petitioner delivered the Globe for the years 1988, 1989, and 1990. Upon his graduation from secondary school in 1994, petitioner was accepted by, and enrolled at, Dartmouth College. On September 2, 1994, the Globe issued a check to petitioner and Dartmouth College in the amount of $5,000 that was applied toward petitioner's first year tuition.
Petitioner did not include the $5,000 in gross income on his 1994 Federal income tax return. Upon examination, respondent determined that the $5,000 was includable in gross income and issued a notice of deficiency.
Petitioner originally contended that section 117 excluded the Globe payment from income. Section 117(a) excludes from income "any amount received as a qualified scholarship". As petitioner now recognizes, however, section 117 does not apply to any amount "which represents payment for * * * services by the student". Sec. 117(c). There is no question that petitioner and the Globe understood that the $5,000 was contingent on petitioner's rendering services. Therefore, as petitioner recognizes, section 117 is inapplicable here.
Petitioner also contends that the payment was an award and exempt from gross income under
Decision will be entered for respondent.
1. Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.