Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jarboe v. Commissioner, No. 12294-98 (1999)

Court: United States Tax Court Number: No. 12294-98 Visitors: 7
Attorneys: Carol J. Jarboe, pro se. Edward J. Laubach, Jr., for respondent.
Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2020
Summary: T.C. Memo. 1999-286 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CAROL J. JARBOE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12294-98. Filed August 27, 1999. Carol J. Jarboe, pro se. Edward J. Laubach, Jr., for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLEY, Judge: By notice dated April 21, 1998, respondent determined the following deficiencies in, and additions to, Carol J. Jarboe's Federal income taxes: -2- Additions to Tax Year Deficiency Sec. 6651(a)(1) Sec. 6654 1991 $7,788 $1,290 $280 1992 7
More
CAROL J. JARBOE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Jarboe v. Commissioner
No. 12294-98
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1999-286; 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 325; 78 T.C.M. 366;
August 27, 1999, Filed

1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 325">*325 Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Carol J. Jarboe, pro se.
Edward J. Laubach, Jr., for respondent.
Foley, Maurice B.

FOLEY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FOLEY, JUDGE: By notice dated April 21, 1998, respondent determined the following deficiencies in, and additions to, Carol J. Jarboe's Federal income taxes:

                   Additions to Tax

               _____________________________

Year    Deficiency      Sec. 6651(a)(1)    Sec. 6654

____    __________      _______________    _________

1991     $ 7,788         $ 1,290       $ 280

1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 325">*326 1992      7,449          1,148        188

1995     13,359          3,340        726

1996     13,625          3,406        731

All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

In a petition filed July 10, 1998, Ms. Jarboe, then a resident of Marion, Pennsylvania, contested all of respondent's determinations. After concessions, the sole issue is whether the income tax laws are constitutional.

The parties submitted this case fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122. Ms. Jarboe, a self-employed practical nurse, received $ 42,480 and $ 43,481 of nonemployee compensation from Absolute Nursing Care, Inc., in 1995 and 1996, respectively. Ms. Jarboe also received $ 1,540 and $ 1,587 of taxable distributions from Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. in 1995 and 1996, respectively. In 1995, Ms. Jarboe received $ 20 of taxable interest from Blue Ridge Bank. Ms. Jarboe did not file Federal income tax returns, and did not pay estimated taxes, relating to 1995 and 1996.

Ms. Jarboe admits that she received compensation from Absolute Nursing1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 325">*327 Care, Inc., distributions from Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co., and interest from Blue Ridge Bank, but contends that the tax laws are unconstitutional. Her contention is meritless. Accordingly, we sustain respondent's determinations.

To reflect the foregoing,

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer