Filed: Oct. 13, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 13, 2006 No. 06-12808 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00013-CV-CDL-3 HOLLY DRACZ, Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant- Appellant, versus AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to The Old Line Life Insurance Company of America, Defendant- Counter-Claimant- Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 13, 2006 No. 06-12808 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00013-CV-CDL-3 HOLLY DRACZ, Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant- Appellant, versus AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to The Old Line Life Insurance Company of America, Defendant- Counter-Claimant- Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 13, 2006 No. 06-12808 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-00013-CV-CDL-3 HOLLY DRACZ, Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant- Appellant, versus AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to The Old Line Life Insurance Company of America, Defendant- Counter-Claimant- Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _________________________ (October 13, 2006) Before DUBINA, BLACK and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Holly Dracz appeals the district court’s exclusion of two expert witnesses and grant of summary judgment in favor of American General Life Insurance Company, in Dracz’s action against American General to obtain the proceeds from her deceased husband’s life insurance policy. After a careful review, we affirm the district court’s exclusion of the expert witnesses and entry of summary judgment for the reasons outlined in the district court’s well-reasoned March 31, 2006, and April 13, 2006, orders. AFFIRMED. 2
