In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-205V Filed: June 10, 2013 Not for Publication ************************************* EDWIN WHITMAN, MD, * * Petitioner, * * Damages decision based on v. * stipulation; influenza vaccine; * Guillain-Barré syndrome; fees SECRETARY OF HEALTH * and costs based on stipulation AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* Robert M. Mitchell, Cedar Ridge, CA, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 On June 10, 2013, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain- Barré syndrome (GBS) as a result of his receipt of influenza vaccine on October 15, 2010. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that petitioner’s GBS, or any other injury, was caused in fact by the influenza vaccine. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access.  The court finds the terms to be reasonable, hereby adopts the parties’ stipulation, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of $117,682.76. The award shall be in the form of a check for $117,682.76 made payable to petitioner. The parties have also agreed on an appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case. In accordance with the General Order #9 requirement, petitioner’s counsel asserts that petitioner incurred no costs to pursue his petition. Petitioner requests $33,552.63 in attorneys’ fees and costs to which respondent does not object. The undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $33,552.63, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and Diamond, Baker & Mitchell, LLP in the amount of $33,552.63. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 10, 2013 /s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2